Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 260 Download : 131

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study is being done in Kerinci to find out how people understand and interpret gender and how the five Kerinci men and women are being used as informants based on life guidance, social relationships, perceptions of patriarchy, social behavior, and the woman's dual role. Case studies and phenomenological data are used in this qualitative study. The informants are chosen on purpose. There are five Kerinci men and women with more than one job, such as government workers, business owners, politicians, or people who run home businesses. The results of this study show that in five cases of Kerinci man and wife informants understand and interpret gender as agreement and conformity of man's and woman's function in taking the role based on cultural and religious values, which are Hargo lihi, adat istiadat, raso sgan, raso go, and religiosity, as part of life-guidance, because these values become the binding frame of man and wife in gender implementation. In the five Kerinci man and wife as informants' case, the double roles of women are seen in the financial development, spiritual gift, motivation, and achievement of themselves and their family. This is because Kerinci people don't stop their wives from working, and their religion lets them do so as long as they keep their hargo lihi, self-esteem, and husband's agreement. Even though there isn't much time to spend at home with your husband in the evening, that doesn't mean it's not good.

Keywords

Gender Gender Eqauality Kerinci Culture

Article Details

Author who publishes in the At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Kebudayaan ISSN: 2086-9754 (Print), 2086-9754 (Online) agrees to the following terms:

Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Gambar terkait

References

  1. Abmurd, and Beilharz, P. (2003). Teori-teori Sosial (Terjemahan oleh: Sigit Jatmiko, Judul Asli: Social Theory). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  2. Ambrois, V. (1992). A Treatise on Gender General Sociology. New York: Dover.
  3. Ambrois, V. (2002). Sociology after Postmodernism. London: Sage.
  4. Amiruddin dan M., Syukur. (2006). Perempuan Pedagang Antarpulau dalam Keterlibatan Pengambilan Keputusan pada Keluarga Bugis (Studi Kasus di Kecamatan Sibulue Kabupaten Bone, Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan). http://www.unhas.or.id.
  5. Asong, E. (1996). Human Communication Theory: Social determinant. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
  6. Budiman, A. (2005). Pembagian Kerja Secara Seksual, Sebuah Pembahasan Sosiologis tetang Peran Perempuan di dalam Masyarakat. Jakarta: Gramedia.
  7. Bungin, B. (2003). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  8. Bungin, B. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial Format-format Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Penerbit: Airlangga University Press.
  9. Cresswell, J. W. (1997). Research Design Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. London: Sage Publication.
  10. Dwiyanto, M. (2008). Persoalan Pokok Mengenai Feminisme dan Relepansinya. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama Bekerjasama dengan Kalyanamitra.
  11. Dwia, B. K. (2006). Memahami Jender. Jakarta: Teplok Press.
  12. Fakih, M. (1996). Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
  13. Fakih, M. (2005). Format-format Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  14. Goode, W. J. (2004). Sosiologi Keluarga. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Jaya.
  15. Goode, William J. 2007. Social Theory Today: Panduan Sistematis Tradisi dan Tren Terdepan Teori Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  16. Guesland, Mc, (2003). Gender Construction. Feminism & Psychology 10:11-29.
  17. Hadi, Hafiful. (2019). Tanah, kuasa, dan niaga: dinamika relasi antara orang Kerinci dan kerajaan-kerajaan Islam di sekitarnya dari abad XVII hingga abad XIX: kajian. Jakarta: Perpustakaan Nasional RI
  18. Indriyani, A. (2006). Gambaran Kehidupan Sosial Keluarga. Jakarta: Penerbit Djambatan.
  19. Johnson, J. (1986). The Structure of Sociological Theory. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  20. Mattulada. (2000). Sosial, Kultur dan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Mandar Maju.
  21. Mattulada. (2003). Dinamika Masyarakat Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Genesindo.
  22. Murdock, P. (1965). Feminist Thought. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  23. Narwoko, J. Dwi dan Suyanto, B. (2004). Sosiologi. Pengantar dan Terapan. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Penerbit Prenada Media.
  24. Parsons, T. (1995). The Study of Sociology. New Delhi: India Offset Press.
  25. Ritzer, G. (2004). Sosiologi: Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda (terjemahan oleh: Alimandan, Judul Asli: Sociology: a multiple paradigm science). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  26. Ritzer, G. & Goodman, D. J. (2004). Teori Sosiologi Modern. Terjemahan oleh Alimandan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
  27. Sastriyani, and S. Hariti. (2009). Gender and Politics. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  28. Sugihastuti, A., dan Sastriyani, N. (2007). Keadilan dan Kesetaraan Jender (Perspektif Islam). Jakarta: Tim Pemberdayaan Perempuan.