Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 18 Download : 12

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to examine EFL Students’ dependence on ChatGPT and its impact on their English learning process. The study focuses on second-semester students of the English Education program at an Islamic higher education institution in Jambi, Indonesia. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, using semi-structured interviews with five participants. The data were analysed thematically to identify students’ experiences and perceptions. The findings indicated that ChatGPT provides positive benefits, including improvements in vocabulary, grammar, and writing skills, as well as rapid feedback accompanied by clear explanations. However, the study also reveals several negative impacts of ChatGPT use, such as decreased critical thinking skills, excessive dependence on AI-generated content, and reduced intrinsic motivation for independent learning. Therefore, this study emphasises that although ChatGPT serves as a supportive tool in English language learning, its use needs to be carefully managed to ensure responsible and effective application. The findings offer insights for educators in integrating ChatGPT by balancing AI technological support with students’ own learning efforts, so that learners remain active and independent in the English learning processThis study aims to examine EFL Students’ dependence on ChatGPT and its impact on their English learning process. The study focuses on second-semester students of the English Education program at an Islamic higher education institution in Jambi, Indonesia. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, using semi-structured interviews with five participants. The data were analysed thematically to identify students’ experiences and perceptions. The findings indicated that ChatGPT provides positive benefits, including improvements in vocabulary, grammar, and writing skills, as well as rapid feedback accompanied by clear explanations. However, the study also reveals several negative impacts of ChatGPT use, such as decreased critical thinking skills, excessive dependence on AI-generated content, and reduced intrinsic motivation for independent learning. Therefore, this study emphasises that although ChatGPT serves as a supportive tool in English language learning, its use needs to be carefully managed to ensure responsible and effective application. The findings offer insights for educators in integrating ChatGPT by balancing AI technological support with students’ own learning efforts, so that learners remain active and independent in the English learning process

Keywords

ChatGPT EFL Students English Learning Process

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author who publishes in the At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Kebudayaan ISSN: 2086-9754 (Print), 2086-9754 (Online) agrees to the following terms:

Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Gambar terkait

References

  1. A, Enkelejda Kasneci, Kathrin Sessler A, Maria Bannert a , Stefan Küchemann b, Daryna Dementieva A, Frank Fischer B, Urs Gasser A, Georg Groh A, et al. 2023. ChatGPT and the educational landscape: risks and opportunities. Nature Human Behaviour, 7: 10–12.
  2. Abdulla, H. M. D., Eltahir, A. M., Alwahaishi, S., Saghair, K. A., Platos, J., & Snasel, V. 2022. Chatbots development using natural language processing: a review. International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC): 122–28. doi:doi: 10.1109/CSCC55931.2022.00030.
  3. Alberth. 2023. The use of ChatGPT in academic writing: A blessing or a curse in disguise?” Teflin Journal 34(2): 337–52. doi:10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i2/337-352.
  4. de Bem Machado, A., dos Santos, J.R., Sacavém, A., Sousa, M.J. 2024. Digital transformations: Artificial intelligence in higher education. 1–23. doi:. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52296-3_1.
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  6. Hutson, James, and Jason Ceballos. 2023. Rethinking education in the age of ai: the importance of developing durable skills in the industry 4.0. Journal of Information Economics 1(2): 26–35. doi:10.58567/jie01020002.
  7. John W. Creswell, J. David Creswell. 2018. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed.
  8. Lee, Hansol, and Jang Ho Lee. 2024. The effects of AI-guided individualised language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning and Technology 28(2): 134–62. doi:10.64152/10125/73575.
  9. Maier, Steven F., and Martin E. Seligman. 1976. Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 105(1): 3–46. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.105.1.3.
  10. Mazlan, N., Nuraida, N., Jelita, J., Utari, A. P., & Ardiani, D. 2024. Outdoor learning based on the local environment to improve student learning activities and outcomes on single substance material at MIN 2 Aceh Tamiang. At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Kebudayaan, 11(1): 1–17.
  11. Mijwil, M. M., Hiran, K. K., Doshi Ruchi, & Manish, D. 2023. ChatGPT and the future of academic integrity in the artificial intelligence era: A new frontier. Al-salam Journal For Engineering and Technology: 116–27.
  12. Mohajan, Haradhan Kumar. 2025. Artificial Intelligence: Prospects and challenges in future progression. Art and Society 4(7): 38–50. doi:10.63593/as.2709-9830.2025.08.003.
  13. Palmer, Edward, Daniel Lee, Matthew Arnold, Dimitra Lekkas, Katrina Plastow, Florian Ploeckl, Amit Srivastav, and Peter Strelan. 2023. Ascilite 2023. : 2019–20.
  14. Quratulain, Saira Maqbool, and Sara Bilal. 2025. The effectiveness of AI-powered writing assistants in enhancing essay writing skills at the undergraduate level. Journal for Social Science Archives 3(1): 845–55. doi:10.59075/jssa.v3i1.166.
  15. Shanta, S., Wells, J.G. 2022. T/E Design-based learning: Assessing student critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. Int J Technol Des Educ 32: 267–285.
  16. Siminto, Siminto. 2023. The Role of technology in improving language skills in education. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal 4(2): 1216–24. doi:10.54373/imeij.v4i2.345.
  17. Thu, Nguyen Huu. 2009. Research into the causes of academic stress among students at Hanoi National University. 3(1997): 219–27.
  18. Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4.
  19. Xiao, Yangyu, and Yuying Zhi. 2023. An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages 8(3): 1–12. doi:10.3390/languages8030212.
  20. Young, Julio Christian, and Makoto Shishido. 2023. Investigating OpenAI’s chatGPT potentials in generating chatbots’ dialogue for English as a foreign language learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 14(6): 65–72. doi:10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140607.
  21. Zaimah. 2019. Penerapan strategi pembelajaran aktif untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA di MTsN Langsa. At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Kebudayaan: 66–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.32505/tarbawi.v6i1.1031.
  22. Zawacki-Richter, Olaf, and Insung Jung. 2023. Handbook of open, distance and digital education. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6.
  23. Zhang, Jian, Zain Abbas, Tahir Ali, Qiqi Liu, and Yuwei Wang. 2024. The impact of ChatGPT on students’ writing proficiency in second language acquisition: Students’ perception and experiences, a qualitative analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 4(1): 1–9. doi:10.51483/IJAIML.4.1.2024.1-9.