Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 2, 2022
Accepted
Dec 29, 2022
Published
Dec 29, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 337 Download : 1033

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

God created human beings in pairs to complement each other between men and women. Marriage is the sunnah of the Prophet, and so much benefit occurs from a marriage bond. Furthermore, marriage is how it is said to be valid in Islam. Whether interfaith marriage is also part of a muslim's personal treasure. In order to answer this, the author uses the tahsis motto in expressing the opinion of Rasyid Ridha in his interpretation, and is also a supporter of several related articles. The results showed that interfaith marriage is an act that cannot be said to be valid even if there are texts (both books and scholarly thoughts), as for the reason because interfaith marriage is irrelevant to the dynamics of current life, especially in the frame of nation and state.

Keywords

Reinterpretation Marriage Different Religions

Article Details

How to Cite
Roni, M., & Nasir, M. (2022). Reinterpretasi Ayat Pernikahan Beda Agama. Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 9(2), 426-436. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v9i2.4636

References

  1. Aliyah, S. “Kaedah-Kaedah Tafsir Fi Zhilaali Al-Quran.” Jurnal Ilmu Agama 14, no. 2 (2013): 39–60.
  2. Analisis, Studi, Tafsir Fi, Zilalil Qur, Muhammad Roni, dan Muhammad Anzaikhan. “Konsep Pemikiran Sayyid Qutb tentang Bai ’ ah :” 6 (2022): 61–82. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i1.3182.
  3. Gultom, Sesilia C Monalisa F. “Wanita dan Ruang Publik.” Universitas Indonesia, 2009.
  4. Hadi, Nur. “Maqashid Syari’Ah Hukum Perkawinan Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Khi).” Al-Fikra : Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman 16, no. 2 (2017): 203. https://doi.org/10.24014/af.v16i2.3831.
  5. Hasani, Adib. “Kontradiksi Dalam Konsep Politik Islam Eksklusif Sayyid Quthb.” Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman 11, no. 1 (2016): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2016.11.1.1-30.
  6. Kognisi, Pengaruh Kebutuhan, Preferensi Risiko, D A N Jenis, Fanny Bidori, Lita Indahsari dan Ida Puspitowati, I Gede Bayu Wijaya, Umi Alifah, et al. “” Industry and Higher Education 3, no. 1 (2021): 1689–99. http://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/JIEB/article/view/3845%0Ahttp://dspace.uc.ac.id/handle/123456789/1288.
  7. Mabrur. “Era Digital dan Tafsir al Qur’an Nusantara: Studi Penafsiran Nadirsyah Hosen di Media Sosial.” Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam dan Sains 2 (2020): 207–13. http://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/kiiis/article/view/403.
  8. Nasruddin. “Sejarah Penulisan Alquran (Kajian Antropologi Budaya).” Sejarah Penulisan Alquran II, no. 1 (2015): 53–68.
  9. Penyampaian, Analisis, G U S Baha, dan D A N Pembahasan. “Ahmad Tanzeh, Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian (Yogyakarta: Teras, 2009), 101. 72,” n.d., 72–99.
  10. Puniman, Ach. “Hukum Perkawinan Menurut Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974.” Yustita 19, no. 1 (2018): 86–94.
  11. Putra, Andika Eka. “Konsep Ahlul al-Kitab dalam Al- Qur ’ an Menurut Penafsiran Muhammed Arkoun dan Nurcholish Madjid.” Al-Dzikra 10, no. 1 (2016): 43–65.
  12. Roni, Muhammad. “Konsep Nur Muhammad Studi Penafsiran Surat an-Nur Ayat 35,” 1985, 88–106.
  13. Roni, Muhammad, dan M. Anzaikhan. “Pembentukan Keluarga Shaleh Dalam Komunikasi Islam: Studi Komparasi Penafsiran Al-Qur’an.” AL-HIKMAH: Media Dakwah, Komunikasi, Sosial dan Budaya 12, no. 1 (2021): 51–61. https://doi.org/10.32505/hikmah.v12i1.2825.
  14. Sudarsono. Hukum perkawinan nasional. Rineka Cipta, 1991.
  15. “tafsir nikah beda agama-dikonversi,” n.d.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'WHERE'