Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 14, 2025
Accepted
Aug 14, 2025
Published
Aug 20, 2025
Download
Pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 170 Download : 109

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia gives the impression of marginalizing wives and does not regulate the possibility of nusyuz committed by husbands. The existing nusyuz norms in Indonesia still reflect gender dominance, which is contrary to the principles of justice and equality increasingly emphasized in modern society. This research seeks to address the legal gap by reconstructing the nusyuz norms in Articles 80, 84, and 149 of the Compilation of Islamic Law, drawing on the concept of Qiraah Mubadalah and John Rawls's theory of justice. This study employs legal research using legislative, historical, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches, with qualitative methods for analyzing legal materials. The findings reveal that the current nusyuz norms in the Compilation of Islamic Law still contain patriarchal bias and fail to fully realize the principle of relational justice. From the perspective of Qiraah Mubadalah, both husbands and wives have the potential to commit nusyuz, thus requiring fair legal treatment. The reconstruction of these norms should affirm the importance of reciprocity (mubadalah) in marital relationships, in which husbands and wives are not positioned hierarchically but as equal partners who fairly fulfill each other’s rights and obligations. Meanwhile, Rawls’s theory of justice suggests that legal norms should be drafted without gender bias, ensuring justice for all parties, particularly those in vulnerable positions. Therefore, the reconstructed nusyuz norms must recognize the mutual rights and obligations of both husband and wife in a fair and equal manner.

Keywords

Compilation of Islamic Law Qira'ah Mubadalah Rawls’s Theory of Justice Nusyuz Norms

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Kadarisman, A., Saifullah, S., Zuhriah, E., Rouf, A., & Hakim, A. (2025). Reconstruction of Nusyuz in the Compilation of Islamic Law from the Perspectives of Qira’ah Mubadalah and Rawls’s Theory of Justice. Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 12(2), 374-395. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v12i2.11356

References

  1. Asniah, Asniah, Yeni Huriani, and Eni Zulaiha. “Kesetaraan Gender Perspektif Hukum Islam Socio Politica.” Jurnal Ilmiah Jurusan Sosiologi, 2023. https://doi.org/https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/socio-politica/article/view/25388.
  2. Badaruddin, Muhammad. “Penyelesaian Nusyuz Dalam Kesetaraan Gender Perspektif Teori Mubadalah.” Al-Ittihad: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (2023): 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61817/ittihad.v9i1.111.
  3. Celbis, Osman, Ismail Altin, Nusret Ayaz, Turgay Bork, and Serdar Karatoprak. “Evaluation of Incest Cases: 4-Years Retrospective Study.” Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 29, no. 1 (2020): 79–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2019.1634664.
  4. Djawas, Mursyid, and Sri Astuti Abdul Samad. “Conflict, Traditional, and Family Resistance: The Pattern of Dispute Resolution in Acehnese Community According to Islamic Law.” SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 4, no. 1 (2020): 65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i1.5271.
  5. Fadhlurrahman, M. Bintang, Naqiyah Mukhtar, Shofia Nur Aini, and Hikmatul Siti Masitoh. “Kajian Kesalingan: Emansipasi Laki-Laki Dan Perempuan Di Ranah Publik Pada Era Kontemporer Dalam Perspektif Al-Quran.” Jurnal Riset Agama 2, no. 1 (2022): 133–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/jra.v2i1.16007.
  6. Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “Teori Keadilan Jhon Rawls.” Jurnal Konstitusi 6 (2009): 15.
  7. Faqihuddin, Abdul Kodir. Qiraah Mubadalah Tafsir Progresif Untuk Keadilan Gender Dalam Islam. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2021.
  8. Fitri, Al, Alamsyah A, Sadari S, and Susanto Is. “Reconstruction Of Nusyuz Concept in Compilation Of Islamic Law.” SMART: Journal of Sharia, Tradition, and Modernity 1, no. 2 (2021): 143–60.
  9. Ghummiah, Shivi Mala. “Qiraah Mubadalah Sebagai Dialektika Penafsiran Ayat-ayat Nusyuz Di Era Kontemporer.” Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 8, no. 2 (2023): 359–74.
  10. Habib, Muhammad, Muhammad Shaleh, and Muhammad Hasbi. “Peran Kiai Dalam Menyelesaikan Konflik Keluarga.” El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 1, no. 2 (2021): 184–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47467/elmujtama.v1i2.729.
  11. Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006.
  12. Jirzanah, and Budisutrisna. “Women’s Equality in Islamic Teachings Seen Through the Perspective of Fair and Civilized Humanity (Kemanusiaan Yang Adil Dan Beradab).” Jurnal Filsafat 33, no. 2 (2023): 246–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.82044.
  13. Kusmardani, Alex, Siah Khosyiaah, Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas, Nurrohman, and Usep Saepullah. “The Development of Ideas on The Reform and Transformation of Islamic Family Law Into Legislation in Islamic Countries.” Jurnal Syntax Imperatif: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan 4, no. 5 (2023): 644–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-imperatif.v4i5.296.
  14. Manna, Nibras Syafriani, Shinta Doriza, and Maya Oktaviani. “Cerai Gugat: Telaah Penyebab Perceraian Pada Keluarga Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Al-Azhar Indonesia Seri Humanior 6, no. 1 (2021): 11–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36722/sh.v6i1.443.
  15. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada, 2010.
  16. Miswanto. “Kritik Konsep Nusyuz Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Perspektif Teori Mubadalah).” Yustisi 11, no. 2 (2024): 209–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v11i2.16676.
  17. Muhammad, Abdul Kadir. Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
  18. Multazam, Umar, and Akhmad Roja Badrus Zaman. “The Mubadalah Approach to Parental Rights and Obligations in Childcare According to Islamic Law.” Journal of Mujaddid Nusantara 1, no. 2 (2024): 46–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62568/jomn.v1i2.139.
  19. Mustafa, Zulhas’ari. “Problematika Pemaknaan Teks Syariat Dan Dinamika Maslahat Kemanusiaan.” Jurnal Mazahibuna 2, no. 1 (2020): 37–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.v2i1.14282.
  20. Mustafid, Sulastri, Achmad Napis Qurtubi, and Hosen. “Sanksi Kebiri Dalam Konteks Kejahatan Seksual Pada Anak Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Teori Keadilan John Rawls.” Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi 9, no. 2 (2023): 148–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v9i2.9430.
  21. Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed An-. Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari’a. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 2008.
  22. Nasution, Bahder Johan. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju, 2008.
  23. Ni’ami, Mohammad Fauzan. “Tafsir Kontekstual Tujuan Pernikahan Dalam Surat Ar Rum:21.” Jurnal Nizham 9, no. 1 (2022): 11–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32332/nizham.v10i1.4469.
  24. Nisa, Martina Purna. “Critical Review of Domestic Violence as Reason for Divorce (Comparison of Divorce Laws in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Maldives).” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 16, no. 1 (2021): 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19105/allhkam.v16i1.4292.
  25. Nudin, Nor Syamimi Mat, and Nor Firdous Mohamed. “Exploring the Long-Term Psychological Impact of Childhood Abuse on Intimate Partner Violence Victims in Malaysia.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 13, no. 5 (2023): 1331–41.
  26. Nurani, Sifa Mulya. “Relasi Hak Dan Kewajiban Suami Istri Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam (Studi Analitis Relevansi Hak Dan Kewajiban Suami Istri Berdasarkan Tafsir Ahkam Dan Hadits Ahkam).” Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies 3, no. 1 (2021): 98–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v3i1.2719.
  27. Prayetno, Eko. “Relasi Suami Istri: Studi Pemikiran Hasbi Ash-Shidieqy, Hamka, Dan M. Quraish Shihab Dalam Q.S Al-Nisa’.” Panangkaran: Jurnal Penelitian Agama Dan Masyarakat 3, no. 2 (2020): 269–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/panangkaran.2019.0302-09.
  28. Putra, Muhammad Habib Adi, and Umi Sumbulah. “Memaknai Kembali Konsep Nusyuz Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam Perspektif Gender & Maqashid Syariah Jasser Auda.” Egalita, 2020. https://doi.org/http://ejournal.uinmalang.ac.id/index.php/egalita/article/view/10179.
  29. Putri, Amelya Fauzia. “Nusyuz Suami Dan Penyelesaiannya Menurut Perspektif Qiraah Mubadalah (Studi Di Desa Manggar, Tlanakan, Madura).” Sakina: Journal of Family Studies 7, no. 4 (2023): 501–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18860/jfs.v7i4.6126.
  30. Quadsajul, Andi Silva, Rihan Dwi Putri, Nur Ramadhani, and Kurniati Kurniati. “Nusyuz Suami Dalam Hukum Islam: Analisis Dampak Terhadap Kehidupan Keluarga.” Akhlak: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Filsafat 2, no. 2 (2025): 90–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61132/akhlak.v2i2.637.
  31. Rafianti, Fitri, and M. Hary Angga Pratama Sinaga. “Nusyuz as the Cause of Domestic Violence: A Comparative Study of Islamic Law and Criminal Law.” International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources 3, no. 1 (2023): 11–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.45.
  32. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. United States of America: Harvard University Press, 1971.
  33. Roji, Muhammad Alwi Bin Sae. “Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2403 K/Pid.Sus/2014,” 2015. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/d2ee512c3d3413da4836fdea720d93b4.
  34. Rosyid, Maskur. “Istishab Sebagai Pemecahan Masalah Kekinian.” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran 18, no. 1 (2018): 45–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18592/sy.v18i1.2125.
  35. Rouf, Abd, Mufidah Ch, and Zaenul Mahmudi. “Joint Property Division in Indonesia: A Gender Equality Viewpoint.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 15, no. 2 (2023): 230–50. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v15i2.23050.
  36. Saifullah. Refleksi Sosiologi Hukum. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2007.
  37. Sidik, Azis Abdul, and Ihsan Imaduddin. “Analisis Penafsiran Tokoh Feminis Terhadap Ayat-Ayat Nusyuz Dalam Al-Quran.” Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas 3, no. 1 (2023): 11–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v3i1.23771.
  38. Solikin, Nur, and Moh. Wasik. “The Construction of Family Law in the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia: A Review of John Rawls’s Concept of Justice and Jasser Auda’s Maqashid Al-Shari’a.” Ulumuna 27, no. 1 (2023): 315–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i1.708.
  39. Sugitanata, Arif. “Transformasi Konsep Hadhanah Di Indonesia: Analisis Kemaslahatan Pada Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2017.” Jurnal Darussalam: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara Dan Perbandingan Mazhab 3, no. 2 (2023): 302–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59259/jd.v3i2.66.
  40. Syam, Syafruddin, Syahrul Syahrul, and Siti Ameliyah. “Pembangunan Politik Hukum Islam Pada Masa Orde Baru, Reformasi Dan Pasca Reformasi.” Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan 17, no. 2 (2023): 1069–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v17i2.1992.
  41. Thaha, Muhammad Ali. Tafsir Al Quran Wa I’rabihi Wa Bayanih. Damaskus: Daru Ibn Kathir, 2009.
  42. Triyudiana, Andra, and Neneng Putri Siti Nurhayati. “Penerapan Prinsip Keadilan Sebagai Fairness Menurut John Rawls Di Indonesia Sebagai Perwujudan Dari Pancasila.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 2, no. 1 (2024): 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/DOI: 10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx.
  43. Wahyudhi, Syukron, and Faza Achsan Baihaqi. “Kontekstualisasi Teori Keadilan John Rawls Pada Konstelasi Kemasyarakatan Di Indonesia (Studi Korelasi Antara Al-Quran Dan Bibel).” Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya 6, no. 2 (2023): 258–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31538/almada.v6i2.3393.