Main Article Content
Abstract
This study analyzes consumer legal protection in the practice of digital concert ticket concierge services in Indonesia based on the right to "accurate, clear, and honest" information under Article 4(c) of the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK), and compares it with the standards in Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act in the United States. Using a normative method with statutory and comparative approaches, the research finds that concierge service practices operate in a specific regulatory vacuum. The norm in the UUPK is vague and inoperable, while protection through civil law and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) is proven to be limited. In contrast, the system in the United States, administered by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), is more effective with objective evaluation standards, the reasonable consumer standard principle, and proactive enforcement mechanisms. It is concluded that Indonesia requires regulatory reform that adopts a more operational approach from the US.
Keywords
Article Details
References
- Azizah, I. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Pembelian Tiket Konser K-pop Melalui Jasa Titip di Media Sosial. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 12(3), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.29123/jhb.v12i3.587.
- Baso, A. N. B., Asnawi, A., & Pramono, A. S. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak atas Informasi Konsumen Jual Beli Online Ditinjau Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.37859/jri.v3i1.4125
- Federal Trade Commission. (2022). Policy Statement Regarding the Scope of Unfair Methods of Competition Under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/P221202Section5PolicyStatement.pdf.
- Firdaus, A. (2023). Analisis Kesesuaian Pasal 28 UU ITE dalam Penanganan Penipuan Jual Beli Tiket Konser di Media Sosial. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Keadilan, 15(2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.30741/jihk.v15i2.892.
- Hidayat, R. (2023). Problematika Pembuktian Transaksi Elektronik Informal dalam Sengketa Konsumen di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 9(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.33379/jhm.v9i1.2341.
- Kusuma, D. (2023). Pertumbuhan Pasar Tiket Sekunder dan Dampaknya terhadap Ekosistem Industri Hiburan Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Digital, 7(3), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.21009/jebd.070303.
- Lembaga Advokasi Konsumen Indonesia. (2024). Laporan Tahunan Keluhan Konsumen Sektor Hiburan Tahun 2023. LAKI Press. https://laki.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Laporan-Tahunan-Hiburan-2023.pdf
- Maulana, I. T., & Pratama, D. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Perjanjian Kuasa dalam Transaksi Jasa Titip Tiket Konser di Media Sosial. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 54(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.v54i1.4567
- Mulyani, S. (2023). Model Self-Regulation untuk Meningkatkan Akuntabilitas Pelaku Jasa Titip Tiket Konser. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 11(2), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.30872/jmbk.v11i2.781.
- Pangestu, R. (2024). Strategi Peningkatan Literasi Hukum Digital bagi Konsumen Generasi Z dalam Transaksi Jasa Titip. Jurnal Pendidikan Hukum Indonesia, 8(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.21070/jphi.v8i1.912
- Putri, T. A. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Jasa Titip (Jastip) Tiket Konser. Hukumonline Klinik. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/perlindungan-hukum-bagi-konsumen-jasa-titip-jastip-tiket-konser-lt6772849f2c50f/.
- Putri, T. A., & Sari, N. K. (2024). Validitas Bukti Elektronik dari Platform Media Sosial dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 12(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.31227/jhap.v12i1.567
- Siregar, F. (2024). Transformasi Digital dan Tantangan Regulasi di Industri Hiburan: Studi Kasus Penjualan Tiket Konser. Jurnal Kebijakan Digital Indonesia, 2(1), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.29122/jkdi.v2i1.1234.
- Wibowo, A. (2023). Analisis Kritis Konstruksi Hukum Penitipan dalam Transaksi Jasa Titip Digital. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 7(2), 155-174. https://doi.org/10.21043/jhes.v7i2.3456