Section Articles

Recognition of Child Placement Periods in LPKS as Part of Detention: Regulatory Disharmony and the Need for Legal Reconstruction

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i1.12555
Anggi Amelia Putri
anggiamelia1803@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Universitas Pasundan (UNPAS), Bandung, Indonesia
Rosa Tedjabuana
Universitas Pasundan (UNPAS), Bandung, Indonesia

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Sep 3, 2025
Accepted
Dec 11, 2025
Published
Feb 6, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 5 Download : 2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, every form of deprivation of liberty for children in conflict with the law, whether through detention in LPAS or placement in LPKS, should receive equal recognition within the framework of criminal procedure law. This principle aligns with the doctrine of the best interest of the child, which requires fair and consistent treatment standards across Indonesia. However, practice shows a lack of uniformity. Some law enforcement officers recognize placement in LPKS as part of detention, while others do not, due to the absence of explicit provisions in Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA). This situation creates legal uncertainty and double harm for children, both juridically and psychologically. This study aims to analyze the urgency of recognizing the period of placement in LPKS as part of detention by highlighting the disharmony between regulations and practice, while also offering regulatory reconstruction to ensure legal certainty. The methodology employed is library research with a qualitative approach, using a normative legal study with a descriptive-analytical method. The findings reveal a legal vacuum concerning the status of placement in LPKS, which has led to disharmony in various regions. Regulatory reconstruction is therefore necessary so that the placement period is recognized as part of detention, thereby ensuring the protection of children’s rights, guaranteeing legal certainty, and fulfilling the primary objectives of the SPPA, namely rehabilitation and child protection.

Keywords

Recognition Juvenile Justice Regulatory Reconstruction

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Amelia Putri, A., & Tedjabuana, R. (2026). Recognition of Child Placement Periods in LPKS as Part of Detention: Regulatory Disharmony and the Need for Legal Reconstruction. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 18(1), 182-197. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i1.12555

References

  1. Abdelmufti, M. A., & Delmiati, S. (2025). Penerapan Pidana Secara Kumulatif oleh Hakim Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review, 4(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.31933/rabry969
  2. Aurellia, S. C., & Wahyuningsih, Y. Y. W. Y. Y. (2024). Normative Problems of the Criminal Elimination of Children Under 12 Years Against Principle of Equality Before the Law. Krtha Bhayangkara, 18(3), 741–757. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v18i3.3181
  3. Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33.
  4. Budiarta, I. G. N. A., & Susrama, I. N. (2023). Urgensi Pembentukan Lembaga Penempatan Anak Sementara (LPAS) Terkait dengan Mekanisme Penahanan terhadap Anak oleh Penuntut Umum (Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Bangli). Jurnal Hukum Mahasiswa, 3(1), 699–711.
  5. Darwanta, A. (2020). Penerapan Prinsip Terbaik untuk Anak (The Best Interest of the Child) dalam Pemenuhan Hak Anak di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak. Reformasi Hukum, 24(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v24i1.83
  6. Fikri, R. A. (2020). Implementasi Diversi terhadap Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Ilmiah Abdi Ilmu, 13(2), 72–81.
  7. Ghoni, M. R., & Pujiyono, P. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum Melalui Implementasi Diversi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i3.331-342
  8. Jati, G. P., & Harjiyatni, F. R. (2022). Implikasi Penitipan Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum di Balai Perlindungan dan Rehabilitasi Sosial Remaja terhadap Putusan Hakim. Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum, 6(1), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.37159/jmih.v6i1.1683
  9. Putri, F. J. E., Sulistiani, L., & Takariawan, A. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Berkonflik dengan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak: Studi pada Lembaga Penyelenggaraan Kesejahteraan Sosial Yayasan Pendidikan Islam I’anatush-Shibyan. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 3(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v3i1.718
  10. Rahmadani, K. D. A., Widyantara, I. M. M., & Karma, N. M. S. (2023). Kebijakan Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak sebagai Upaya Pengalihan Peradilan Formal. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 5(1), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.5.1.2023.106-113
  11. Rosmala, Prasetyawati, E., & Alfiyan, A. (2024). Implementasi Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan Oleh Anak Ditinjau Dari Restorative Justice (Studi Pada Pengadilan Negeri Liwa Nomor: 21/Pid.Sus/PN.Liw/2023): Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 23(02), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v23i02.18200
  12. Santoso, S. T., Pratiwi, S., & Saefullah, S. (2023). Penyelesaian Perkara Anak yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 5/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst dan Putusan Nomor 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Jkt.Brt.). UNES Law Review, 6(1), 2115–2129. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.945
  13. Saraswati, R., Simandjuntak, M. E., Soerjowinoto, P., Boputra, E., & Wijaya, E. M. K. (2025). Evaluasi Penerapan Diversi dan Restoratif Justice 12 Tahun Berlakunya UU SPPA. Jurnal Jendela Hukum, 12(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.24929/jjh.v12i1.4215
  14. Senandi, W. A. A., & Krey, T. H. M. Y. (2025). Analisis tentang Penanganan Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum, 6(1), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.55551/jip.v6i1.430
  15. Septiany, W., & Septianita, H. (2024). Akibat Hukum Onvoldoende Gemotiveerd Dalam Putusan Anak Berdasarkan Asas Lex Posterior Derogat Legi Priori (Studi Putusan Nomor 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/Pn Kwg). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 5(1), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.2902
  16. Sitanggang, B. F., & Cahyaningtyas, I. (2020). Penanganan Perkara Anak dalam Perspektif Jaksa Penuntut Umum. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i1.66-81
  17. Sitompul, A., Haryadi, H., & Munandar, T. I. (2020). Penahanan Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(3), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i3.11090
  18. Supriyatna, Sujatno, A., & Aris, U. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak yang Sedang Menjalani Proses Pembinaan di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(9), 4987–4999. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i9.13578
  19. Tantowi, W. (2021). Problematika Jangka Waktu Penahanan Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum (Studi Putusan Nomor 29/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN.SMN). Verstek, 9(2), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i2.51106
  20. Wati, E. R. (2017). Penanganan Anak yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.30651/justitia.v1i2.1162
  21. Wati, U. R. (2021). Penitipan Anak yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum di Balai Perlindungan Rehabilitasi Remaja Daerah Sleman. Lex Renaissance, 6(3), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss3.art15
  22. Wulandari, S. (2022). Perlindungan Anak Nakal yang Dikenai Penahanan dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education, 1(4), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.55606/concept.v1i4.214
  23. Zenegger, T. A., Ismansyah, I., & Zurnetti, A. (2024). Urgensi Pelaksanaan Diversi Terhadap Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum dalam Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dalam Pengulangan Tindak Pidana: (Studi kasus terhadap Perkara Nomor 3/Pid.Sus Anak/2022.PN.Pnn dan Nomor 4/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022.PN.Pnn). UNES Law Review, 6(4), 12120–12133. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2185