Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 336 Download : 310

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research investigates personal deixis that indicate solidarity in campus environment. Students and lecturers conversation transcription were collected and analyzed by the researcher to identify the types of personal pronoun that commonly used to pointer the participants. The result showed that there were three kinds of pronoun used commonly by the participants and those indicate close relationship among others such as first person singular, second person singular, and third person plural. The finding revealed that the second person singular of bro, sist, and jeng are common in pointing speakers' audience. Eventhough, those become slang language in society. The implication of this research suggested for other types of pronoun to be exist in campus environment and indicate power.

Keywords

Personaldeixis Addressing System Solidarity

Article Details

How to Cite
SriAgung, W. K. (2018). PERSONAL DEIXIS AS ADDRESSING SYSTEM TO EXPRESS SOLIDARITY AT CAMPUS COMMUNITY. JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching), 3(1), 11-29. https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v3i1.332

References

  1. Berg, B. L. (2001).Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. California: Allyin Bacon.
  2. Biklen&Bogdan. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. USA: Pearson International.
  3. Coupland, N., & Adam J. (1997). Sociolinguistics A Reader and Coursebook. United States of America: St. Martin‟s Press.
  4. Cruse, D. A. (2004). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Given, L. M. (2008).The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. California: SAGE Publications, Inc,.
  6. Gumperz, J. (1977). The Speech Community in Pier GiglioedLanguage and Social Context. New York: Penguin Books.
  7. Holmes, J. (1992).An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
  8. Hudson, R. A.(1980).Sociolinguistics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Hymes, D. (1972). On Communicative Competence in J.B Pride and J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  10. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  11. Levinson, S. C. (1983).Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Littlejohn, Stephen. (2008). Theories of Human Communication. California: Wadsworth Publishing.
  13. Maulana, R., &Opdenakker,M. C. (2014). Do Teacher-Student Relationships Deteriorate Over Time? inBarry J Fraser and Jeffrey P. Dorman Interpersonal Relationship in Education: From Theory to Practice. Roterdam: Sense Publisher.
  14. McMahon, A. M. S. (1994). Understanding Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Norman, F. (1984). Language and Power. United Kingdom: Longman.
  16. O‟Grady, W. D., Dobrovolsky,M., &Katamba,F. (1997). Contemporary Linguistics: An Introduction. London: Longman.
  17. Purwo, B. K. (1984).DeiksisdalamBahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: BalaiPustaka.
  18. Robert, & Cooper. (2012).Qualitative Research in the Post-Modern Era. New York: Springers.
  19. Samosir, N.B. (2012). An Analysis of Deixis in the Article of The Jakarta Post. (Undergraduate thesis, State University of Medan, 2012). Retrieved from http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/16792/
  20. Seidmen, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research. New York: Teachers College Press.
  21. Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. New York: The Guilford Press.
  22. Sutopo, H. B. (2006).MetodePenelitianKualitatif. Surakarta: UNS Press.